Dorms with No Liquor Or Drugs University housing choices may rank near the top the list of items that can influence your higher education experience. Your memories of dorm, Greek or living that is off-campus stick to you the rest you will ever have and make for many interesting — and colorful — stories to share together with your kids and friends as the years carry on.

At some colleges, due to problems related to over-enrollment, living conditions have begun off rather rocky. Some years back, dorm space was so scarce that a number of incoming first-years had to live in a screened-off section of the main student union building at Penn State’s University Park campus. How strange is?

The overflow of enrollees one year required a gathering of modular homes (a.k.a at Princeton University. ‘trailers’) on a previous athletic field, resulting in just what appeared to be a little retirement community for older people. There have been some disparaging remarks made about those atypically housed first-years, the majority of which originated from all the other Princetonians whom lived in the Gothic splendor of this other vaunted domestic universities.

There clearly was one choice, but, that, I would definitely pursue because of its overall qualities and promise: substance-free housing (SFH) if I were headed to college today,. If you are involved in the college procedure right now or understand an individual who is a scholar who lives on campus, you’ve got probably been aware of SFH. What exactly is it and exactly what might be some advantages and disadvantages about any of it?

Think of University Stereotypes

What is perhaps one of the most images that are common comes in your thoughts whenever you picture stereotypes of university life? Fraternity parties? Empty beer kegs flying through windows? Staggering pupils? The smell of hops, cigarette and barley or marijuana smoke permeating the air? Stereotypes occur for the reason. They’re often quite alarmingly accurate. Think Animal Home.

If you should be switched off by most of these habits, then you may want to explore the SFH choices at the colleges to that you simply’re considering applying or where you decide to enlist this springtime. I did so a search for schools offering substance-free housing and, as always, I was overrun with links. One link that came up had been this 1, which had a partial but list that is interesting of. Here’s a sampling:

Albright College (studying, Pa.): Single-sex floors, flats. Honors, first-year, substance-free and break housing

Bucknell University (Lewisburg, Pa.): Substance-free, Judaic studies, Afro-American studies and ecological cooperative housing

James Madison University (Harrisonburg, Va.): Theme housing for worldwide, learning and substance-free, and second-year experience communities. Fraternity houses located off campus

New York University (ny, N.Y.): Wellness, theme, substance-free, first-year experience, sophomore experience, residing learning and co-ed housing

Babson College (Babson Park, Mass.): Substance-free, special-interest and discounted housing

Is SFH Effective?

The more cynical among us may question the effectiveness of SFH. I’ve heard doubters state that some SFH residents live where there are not any ‘substances’ but then wander far from their SF dorms and head to parties here and there. Thus, they cite a feature of hypocrisy. Just What do a little news state how well SFH works?

‘ … As it ends up, it will really make a difference.,’ says the latest York days. ‘No one claims that pupils who inhabit substance-free housing abstain from smoking, drinking alcohol or drugs that are using. But at least according to one study, they don’t indulge as much as others. A 2001 study greater than 14,000 students nationwide found that, compared with other students, only three-fifths as many residents of substance-free housing reported binge consuming in the previous a couple of weeks.

‘There were other benefits, too. Students in substance-free housing, the research found, had been less likely to experience alcohol-related issues, like getting behind in schoolwork, damaging property, engaging in trouble because of the police or riding with a driver that is drunken.

‘There is, of course, a chicken-and-egg element to these findings. Students longing for a college experience that bears some relationship to Animal House aren’t prone to decide for substance-free housing. …

‘ … At many campuses, residents of regular dorms, and also those assigned to substance-free housing they didn’t demand, say they’ve been happy the possibility exists.

”I think it is good that universities have a health choice,’ said Beatrice Capestany, a freshman who was simply assigned to your health corridor of Vassar’s sole remaining dorm that is all-female although she did not demand it. ‘My dorm is really a excellent spot to come back house to if I gone away. It smells a lot nicer than some other dorms, too.’ On that exact same health corridor, Victoria Ramsey and Kathryn Thomas, both freshmen, could never be more satisfied with their option.

”i don’t drink or smoke, and our corridor is quiet and clean,’ said Ms. Ramsey.

‘Ms. Thomas added: ‘I wanted a peaceful destination for studying. Sometimes it’s a refuge, for those who come and stay till they understand the party on their flooring has died down.”

Okay. That is the good part associated with SFH coin. To keep reasonable and balanced, let’s take a look at the flip side, and a few points from Andrew Gottlieb’s Why substance free housing is really a idea that is bad

‘ I became surprised to discover that substance free residents are permitted to take in, and many more amazed to learn that many do take in. Also despite these surprises, my freshmen experience has led me to just take issue that is serious the notion of substance-free housing. It really is just unnecessary, unjust and divisive to designate entire floors as substance free.

‘ … If some one is firm in their decision to not partake in drinking, she or he could do so no matter where he or she lives. If he or she prefers not even to own liquor within the room, there may be an option to choose a substance free roomie, without designating entire floors as substance free.

‘The substance designation that is free unjust because often the choice to survive a substance-free flooring isn’t left in the possession of of a student. I have met many pupils whose parents forced them to call home on a floor that is sub-free or worse, I’ve met pupils whom did not ask to reside for a sub-free floor but were placed on one anyhow mainly because Residential Life needed to fill rooms. University is just a place where at long final, young people achieve complete liberty. Making a living choice which may be better than many parents but not to ever their children is really a disservice to pupils plus an intrusion regarding the liberty that college claims. …

‘ … The fact is that throughout almost every Wash. U. graduate’s life, they have to work well with and most likely live with or near those who don’t agree with their decisions that are personal alcohol and other substances. a chance that is important plan this part of life will come in university. The opportunity to live with, understand and respect the various alternatives of one’s classmates is indispensable. Washington University should recognize this opportunity that is important change its housing policies, which currently hamper it.’

Gottlieb verifies that some SFH residents do, indeed, imbibe, which somewhat substantiates the hypocrisy argument, although you’ve got to comprehend the intent of every university’s SFH guidelines therefore the motives of the who decide to live here (and perhaps the perspective of the who’ve been quartered there as being a matter of random positioning).

Some Schools Have Contracts

If you should be into highly quantified thinking about SFH, then you may care to always check the Journal out of Studies on Alcohol, funded by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Harvard Gazette recommendations that and attests to your aspect that is positive of when it notes:

Residents of university housing where smoking and alcohol were prohibited were less likely to be victims of actions by students who were consuming. Findings through the Harvard class of Public wellness College Alcohol Study show that substance-free college residence halls are making an effect in the work to lessen the harms that hefty consuming creates among college students. It was the study that is first take a nationwide look at the relationship between substance-free dorms and also the ramifications of liquor on university campuses. …

Do SFH residents need certainly to make a pledge they shall adhere to the guidelines of their university’s SFH charter? Listed here is an example of how Davidson College handles the SFH ‘contract’ [see my bold emphasis]:

You can expect substance-free housing for the people students who wish to reduce their visibility in their living environment to alcohol and behavior that is alcohol-related illicit medications and smoking cigarettes materials. Pupils staying in these communities consent to not use alcohol or medications on the floor community nor bring the effects of these substances back into the hall.

A web link to your housing that is substance-free is a part of a message from Jason Shaffer. Halls and/or floors become designated as substance-free is determined after applications are received.

All students picking a substance free assignment will be needed to finish a substance free housing contract. Failure to uphold the objectives will result in relocation likely to some other project.

The school Confidential discussion forum users have debated the pros and cons of SFH. Here are a few reviews from this informative thread:

‘Our daughter had been afraid to choose sub-free her freshman year because she was not certain what it really meant in terms of the kinds of children that she’d be combined with. It absolutely was too basic at her school. a “quiet dorm” would’ve been something she’d have probably picked, but “sub-free” seemed too general. Even though she actually is not really a partier, she’s got friends who are. Within the end, she regretted maybe not selecting it, I think. But it really depends upon the school as well as the kid.’

‘At both my youngsters’ big state universities, all of the dorms had been officially called ‘substance free’ but that don’t stop kids from doing whatever they wished to do. My son knew some guys that got kicked out from the dorms within the very first semester of freshman year one for cannabis usage and the other for drinking …’

‘My daughter did substance housing that is free first couple of years at a tiny liberal arts university. The kids had to signal an agreement which they would not drink or smoke cigarettes inside or get back to the dorm beneath the influence(or back bring anyone else beneath the impact). There was clearly no stigma, only a nice peaceful dorm without wild events. Like other people said, no vomit in the spaces that are public vandalism damage. Best benefit had been nobody ever pulled the fire security the evening!’

Therefore, when you’re considering your university housing options, it could spend to see how (or if) substance-free housing would squeeze into your plans. All the given information you need to decide about this can be obtained on your own colleges’ housing web pages. Try it out!